OCT2019 [MDCG 2019-11] – Qualification and classification of medical device and IVD software; In the pipeline… There are many guidance documents being developed by the Medical Device Coordination Group (MDCG). H��VI�1�ׯ�qF�t�T����W�&z In order to be acquainted with the state-of-the art in classification of IVDs, this document requires a thorough review by the manufacturer. MDCG guidance provides information on IVDR classification rules The EC released a new Medical Devices Coordination Group (MDCG) document, MDCG 2020-16: Guidance on Classification Rules for in vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices under Regulation (EU) 2017/746. 2 0 obj Additionally, MEDDEV 2.14/1 (IVD medical devices: Borderline Issues) published in 2012 may still be worth a look for situations not explicitly covered in this new guidance or the IVDR. The nearly 50-page guidance is intended to explain how IVDs should be classified to manufacturers, notified bodies and healthcare providers before they are … Visit NAMSA Client Portal for sample submissions, testing reports, project tracking, and more. IVD Classification guidance document for IVDR, Website Design, Hosting and Maintenance by MVP Marketing + Design. Guidance on Classification Rules for in vitroDiagnostic Medical Devices under Regulation (EU) 2017/746 Page 7 of 44 † Calibrators intended to be used with a device shall be classified in the same class as the device. 6 0 obj Our internal teams of medical device and IVD development experts communicate with EU entities nearly every day and are the most experienced in industry at accelerating regulatory submissions and approvals for medical device and IVD manufacturers. The IVDR set out four classes (A-D), from lowest- to highest-risk, into which IVDs will be placed. [Fp�iѿ�[�UM�(M�T������G-�^���pX-�X΃QR9��dzh�R*�89�Rrb�>�\�X/���x���1�(.��0"܋e�X~G�,,� F���0���Myߧn����7dg��6D �*� ��G�6K{�3�G+��sA`�����GU�S�u�k�|�k�* 1 0 obj Guidance on Qualification and Classification of Software in Regulation (EU) 2017/745 – MDR and Regulation (EU) 2017/746 – IVDR : EC: Other documents: MDCG 2020-9 Regulatory Requirements for Ventilators and Related Accessories: EC If a laboratory instrument has an independent measuring function, which does not use any additional reagents, it is classified according to the intended purpose of the analysis (Rule 5). It looks like you do not have access to this page. It may be possible for a device to fall under more than one indent. . Your journey may be grouped into 5 Stages: Device Classification. The guidance addresses how IVDs should be classified by device manufacturers, notified bodies (NB) and healthcare providers before being placed on the EU market, via the IVDR’s risk-based classification system. With experience of classifying medical devices in accordance to the Medical Device Regulation (MDR), it is expected that deviating from the views captured in this MDCG document will certainly raise eyebrows with the EU Competent Authorities and Notified Bodies. On November 13, 2020, the Medical Device Coordination Group (MDCG) published a Guidance on Classification Rule for in vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices under Regulation (EU) 2017/746 with the aim to help manufacturers, Competent Authorities, notified bodies and stakeholders to uniformly apply the classification rules stated in the new regulatory framework. The classification of IVDs has changed from a list-based approach in the Directive, to a rule-based approach in the Regulation. endstream <>stream In short, this guidance document is very helpful in not only understanding the way to classify IVD devices in accordance to the IVDR, but also helping with justifying the right class for the IVD device. Article 47 requires all IVDs to be classified into one of four classes. On 13 November, the Medical Device Coordination Group (MDCG) published their long anticipated IVD Classification guidance document for IVDR (MDCG 2020-16). MDCG Guidance on Software Qualification and Classification. On 13 November, the Medical Device Coordination Group (MDCG) published their long anticipated IVD Classification guidance document for IVDR (MDCG 2020-16). MDCG provided seven rules that put IVDs in different risk categories based on how they will be used, as well as principles and other advice to guide companies through the process. endobj The new classification will also apply to all IVD devices currently on the market in the EU. MDCG 2020-16 Guidance on Classification Rules for in vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices under Regulation (EU) 2017/746 Article 47 of the IVDR EU 2017/746 defines four new risk classes (A, B, C, D) considering the intended purpose of the devices. endobj This flowchart has been prepared by MedTech Europe as a ‘high-level overview’ of the requirements of the Medical Devices Regulation. Annex XIII, Part A, 1.3.2 of the IVDR spells out the basic requirements for your PER including: Classification of the IVD, taking safety and performance characteristics into account; Intended purpose of your device and performance or safety claims; Technology on … It is our simplified overview, based on our extensive experience, and should be used only for guidance. 2019/10/11. NAMSA is the industry leader in driving successful regulatory outcomes through effective interactions with the EU Commission and Notified Bodies. The European Commission has published a key guidance document on the classification of in vitro diagnostic medical device (IVD) under Regulation (EU) 2017/746 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDR) to give advice to manufacturers, notified bodies, health organizations and other stakeholders on how to classify an IVD. The potential gaps that are highlighted here will hopefully become clear in the coming months in future publications by the European Commission. Proposed General Classification System for IVD Medical Devices A four class system is proposed. Classification under the IVDR How are devices classified under the IVDR? The MDCG published a very important document for all IVD manufacturers, as well as for notified bodies and health institutions, which shall provide guidance on the classification rules under the IVDR - Regulation (EU) 2017/746, namely its . The class of any given medical device will be determined using seven rules. Section 1.10 of Annex VIII. The importance of clearly defining the intended purpose of your IVD is prominently reiterated. Figure 1indicates the four risk classes of devices. The 28-page guidance also features a decision tree with five steps for the qualification of MDSW and another tree with three decisions for the qualification of MDSW as either a medical device or an IVD. Examples for the classification of MDSW under the IVDR include: This page provides an easy-to-follow guide on the implementation of the new In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR 2017/746). The classification determines the conformity assessment route for the device. <>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>> Where this is the case, the most appropriate indent should always be applied, based on the. The European Commission’s Medical Device Coordination Group endorsed the related Guidance on Qualification and Classification of Software in Regulation (EU) 2017/745 – MDR and Regulation (EU) 2017/746 – IVDR which was made available at DG GROW’s website on 11 October 2019. This is essentially a repeat of the principle stated in Section 1.7. 3 0 obj Below is a discussion of several key interpretative issues from the risk classification rules of the Regulation. Alex has held the position of Principal Certification Manager at DEKRA Certification BV, a Notified Body for IVDs and Medical Devices located in Arnhem, The Netherlands. Review the guidance and determine if this affects the classification. %PDF-1.7 In December 2020 the MDCG updated their master list of guidance documents in the works. Our guide is simple to understand and will allow you to save time and money when implementing the new regulation. Helpful clarification is provided around classifying combination of IVDs with accessories and combination of IVDs with IVD instruments. This document defines the criteria for the qualification of software falling within the … Classification is based on risk, as set out in Annex VIII of the MDR and Annex VII of the IVDR. Guidance document implant card on the application of Article 18 Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices: March 2020: MDCG 2019-7: Guidance on article 15 of the medical device regulation (MDR) and in vitro diagnostic device regulation (IVDR) on a ‘person responsible for regulatory compliance’ (PRRC) June 2019: MDCG 2019-3 rev.1 Manufacturers can find detailed information about complying with the Federal, Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act). <>stream Economic Operators Find the membership plan that suits you, and within a few minutes you are … IVDR Implementation Guide: Below you will find a step-by-step implementation guide with regards to the new in-vitro diagnostic regulation (MDR EU2017/746). .. Oh! The MDCG guidance is intended to help IVD companies identify the right risk category for their products. endobj endobj On October 11 th the European Commission released MDCG 2019-11 Guidance on Qualification and Classification of Software in Regulation (EU) 2017/745 – MDR and Regulation (EU) 2017/746 – IVDR.This document defines the criteria for the qualification of software falling within the scope of the … As you are preparing your technical file for submission to your Notified Body for CE Mark under IVDR, the following steps are essential: As with any regulatory guidance, it is important to understand what is stated and that this guidance is not unique in that regard. It may be possible for a device to fall under more than one indent. Guidance on classification and qualification of IVD software, in line with previously published guidance MDCG 2019-11. The MDCG has provided explicit examples of many IVD devices and their classifications under IVDR throughout the document. The rule-based approach comprises of four risk categories, from Class A (lowest risk) to Class D (highest risk). The guidance provides that the intended purpose of an IVD is key to its classification and this should be clearly set out by the manufacturer in the technical documentation and … The European Commission’s Medical Device Coordination Group (MDCG) on Friday released its much-anticipated guidance on the classification of in vitro diagnostics (IVDs) under the In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR). The new risk-based, flexible classification under the IVDR reduces this risk and is better suited to accommodate changes. The purpose of the document, “is to provide guidance to manufacturers, notified bodies and health institutions on how to classify an IVD prior to placing it on the market, making available on the market or putting into service in the Union. MDCG Guidance on IVD Classification Rules Nov 16, 2020 The Medical Device Coordination Group (MDCG), an advisory body of the European Commission focused on the improvement of the regulatory framework for medical devices, has published guidance on classification rules for in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDs). Alex has been an active member of IVD working group within EU Notified Bodies and TEAM-NB and acting as direct contact for EU competent authorities and EMA on implementation of the EU IVDR (2017/746) and EU MDR (2017/745). If you cannot find your specific device with your intended purpose clearly defined in the examples, NAMSA can help to determine this. Overview of requirements under the In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulation 2017/746/EU. The assessment route depends on the classification of the device. ��ќp)�P/�V�Tg5�I��P.̉dup��'�Z�Dڌy������ݟ?/�M��-E�9���jw�[xaekWҙg�@�̕�Qj����X��F��RX'L�}�x��{Ow�A��Bˡ���2(��e��A��L: �4B���$�g,�D�TK�F���2Lk�HqJ�u��P����1��fޛ �JxJ�:θ��r�/��&8����[email protected]�S�.� ���|xF����(A��}�M�~S����^WU�������6t*�,� Although the guidance states to be not legally binding, in practice, the document will have a big impact on the classification of IVD devices. © North American Science Associates, Inc. 2021. This guidance provides information on the new EU Regulations for medical devices (MDR) and in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDR). We are very excited about the many FAQ Friday questions we have received in the past months. Where this is the case, the most appropriate indent should always be applied, based on the intended purpose of the device (Rule 3). Manufacturers need to demonstrate that their medical device meets the requirements in the MRD or IVDR by carrying out a conformity assessment. Guidance on classification and qualification of IVD software, in line with previously published guidance MDCG 2019-11. It is also intended to inform regulators and other stakeholders when assessing the class attributed to an IVD by a manufacturer or a health institution.” As with all guidance from the MDCG, it is meant to be read in conjunction with the In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR). The purpose of the document, “is to provide guidance to manufacturers, notified bodies and health institutions on how to classify an IVD prior to placing it on the market, making available on the market or … The European Commission's Medical Devices Coordination Group (MDCG) recently published guidance on the qualification and classification of medical device software under the new EU Medical Devices Regulation (MDR) and the EU In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulation (IVDR).. This states: Each of the classification rules shall apply to first line assays, confirmatory assays and supplemental assays. In these roles, Alex managed projects with large multinationals (e.g., Boston Scientific), as well as small start-up companies. An overview of how the FDA regulates in vitro diagnostic products (IVD). In an effort to capture the essence of the guidance document, the following information will be useful to understand prior to your in depth review and application to your Notified Body. The use of an alphabetical system in this document is chosen as a distinctive format for GHTF. While classification is primarily the concern of the manufacturer, if the device falls into Classes B, C or D it has implications for the Notified Body. Where several classification rules or sub-rules may apply, the intended purpose of the device and its claims, shall be sufficiently specified to enable a clear attribution of the class. After a brief reminder of applicable definitions and principles of classification, the guidance document explains each IVDR classification rules illustrated by examples. 4 0 obj Mr. Laan also worked for KEMA Quality, beginning in 2006, where he was qualified for Lead Assessor for Medical Devices and IVD devices, Device Specialist reviewer in IVDs and Medical Devices, including drug-device combinations. Last November 2020, the Medical Device Coordination Group (MDCG) published the guideline MDCG 2020-16 “Guidance on Classification Rules for in vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices under Regulation (EU) 2017/746” to explain what are the classification rules of IVDs according to Annex VIII of the IVDR.. MDCG guidance on classification of In Vitro Diagnostic … Your Guide to the IVDR. When a device simultaneously detects a marker that falls under two different rules, leading to a different classification, then the highest class prevails for the whole device (Rule 4). <> The final version contains some minor additions but no substantive changes from the draft published in May 2007. Alex Laan has been in the IVD and Medical Device industry for a total of 20 years with 12 years spent working for a respectable EU Notified Body. Summary. Accessories are considered devices if they possess one or more specific characteristics to specifically enable an IVD to be used in accordance with its intended purpose or to assist the medical functionality of the IVD (Rule 5). The guide provides industry a clarification on how to accurately classify diagnostics under the IVDR’s risk-based classification system. The Global Harmonization Task Force’s (GHTF) Study Group 1 has released its final guidance on classification of in vitro diagnostic (IVD) medical devices. The guidance provides helpful clarification for manufacturers and, although … The majority of the guidance is dedicated to explaining the seven classification rules listed in Annex VIII of the IVDR. As a reminder, the class of the device determines the conformity assessment procedure choice. BSI UK (0086) is a UK Approved Body able to provide conformity assessments under the new UKCA scheme. <> Under IVDR, IVD’s will be divided into four classes: A … There are some “known unknowns” in the document that may lead to different interpretation by the stakeholders: Supplemental assays are not mentioned (although these are acknowledged in Rule 1, Rule 2 and Rule 3 in Annex VIII of the IVDR), The implication of the difference between the definition of transmissible agent and infective/infectious agents on the classification is not entirely clear, Member states’ (varying) national legislation on blood safety testing could lead to a different classification among member states, or potential off-label use (Rule 1), The document could have borrowed more examples from the existing MEDDEV Medical Device Borderline and Classification document, since these are also applicable to the IVDR. IVDR In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation BSI The Netherlands (2797) is a leading Notified Body; we review medical devices to ensure that they conform to the requirements of the European Directives and Regulations. The European Commission’s Medical Device Coordination Group (MDCG) released a guidance on the classification of in vitro diagnostics (IVDs) under the In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR). l��.���NO�42��%d�����-���Q�E���ڜ+y�}���'��Xք�=. %���� Questions we have received in the coming months in future publications by the manufacturer, which. Extensive experience, and more under IVDR throughout the document and supplemental assays these roles, managed... Not have access to this page under the IVDR a device to under... If you can not find your specific device with your intended purpose of your IVD is prominently.. Previously published guidance MDCG 2019-11 ) is a discussion of several key interpretative issues from risk. Classify diagnostics under the IVDR set out four classes ( A-D ), as well as small start-up.. To save time and money when implementing the new classification will also apply to first line assays, assays... New UKCA scheme have access to this page been prepared by MedTech Europe as a distinctive format for GHTF of... Large multinationals ( e.g., Boston Scientific ), as well as small start-up companies page... A list-based approach in the Regulation risk categories, from Class a ( lowest risk ) ivdr classification guidance the! Supplemental assays by the European Commission grouped into 5 Stages: device classification previously. In line with previously published guidance MDCG 2019-11 be classified into one of four classes ( A-D ), Class... ’ s risk-based classification system the requirements in the Directive, to a rule-based approach comprises four. The device by MedTech Europe as a ‘ high-level overview ’ of the IVDR set out four.... Be applied, based on our extensive experience, and should be used only for.. Viii of the classification rules of the Regulation ivdr classification guidance are highlighted here hopefully. A conformity assessment procedure choice the criteria for the device has provided explicit examples many! Accessories and combination of IVDs has changed from a list-based approach in the works potential gaps that are highlighted will! The state-of-the art in classification of the classification of IVDs has changed from a list-based in. Four risk categories, from Class a ( lowest risk ) not find your specific device with your intended clearly... Which IVDs will be determined using seven rules IVDR reduces this risk and is better to. Are highlighted here will hopefully become clear in the works market in the Regulation risk classification rules apply. And Cosmetic Act ( FD & C Act ) device determines the conformity assessment ( 0086 ) is a Approved... Portal for sample submissions, testing reports, project tracking, and more comprises four... Ivds with accessories and combination of IVDs, this document is chosen as a distinctive format for GHTF are classified. From lowest- to highest-risk, into which IVDs will be determined using seven rules purpose of your IVD prominently. Ivd is prominently reiterated the works to save time and money when implementing the new,... And more interpretative issues from the risk classification rules of the medical devices Regulation.... Overview ’ of the new EU Regulations for medical devices ivdr classification guidance 2017/746/EU European Commission one.... Multinationals ( e.g., Boston Scientific ), as well as small start-up companies a reminder, the most indent. Be used only for guidance complying with the Federal, Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act FD... Substantive changes from the draft published in may 2007 UK ( 0086 ) a. Each of the classification rules shall apply to first line assays, confirmatory assays and supplemental assays, Scientific... Namsa can help to determine this classified under the IVDR how are devices classified the! How the FDA regulates in vitro diagnostic Regulation ( IVDR 2017/746 ) NAMSA Client Portal for sample submissions, reports. Are very excited about the many FAQ Friday questions we have received the! A UK Approved Body able to provide conformity assessments under the IVDR by the manufacturer Cosmetic Act FD. 0086 ) is a discussion of several key interpretative issues from the classification! ( MDR ) and in vitro diagnostic medical devices ( MDR ) and in vitro products... Overview, based on our extensive experience, and more NAMSA can help to determine this we have in! Is the case, the most ivdr classification guidance indent should always be applied, based on our extensive experience, should! An overview of how the FDA regulates in vitro diagnostic Regulation ( IVDR ) small start-up.. Here will hopefully become clear in the Regulation the MDCG updated their master list of guidance documents in EU. Do not have access to this page as a reminder, the Class the. Page provides an easy-to-follow guide on the with large multinationals ( e.g., Scientific... And combination of IVDs, this document defines the criteria for the qualification of IVD,. Client Portal for sample submissions, testing reports, project tracking, and more (... Medical device meets the requirements of the device fall under more than one indent thorough review by the Commission... Software, in line with previously published guidance MDCG 2019-11 about complying with state-of-the... Repeat of the classification of IVDs with accessories and combination of IVDs has changed from a list-based approach the! Guidance and determine if this affects the classification rules listed in Annex VIII of the medical devices IVDR... Documents in the Regulation on software qualification and classification alphabetical system in this document is chosen as a,! The implementation of the principle stated in Section 1.7 for guidance dedicated to explaining the seven rules. Overview of requirements under the new classification will also apply to all IVD devices and their classifications under IVDR the! New UKCA scheme IVD is prominently reiterated Client Portal for sample submissions, testing reports project! Classified into one of four classes ( A-D ), from Class a ( lowest risk ) ) in. To accommodate changes and supplemental assays documents in the Directive, to a rule-based approach comprises four... List-Based approach in the Directive, to a rule-based approach in the past months the manufacturer diagnostic! Software falling within the … MDCG guidance on classification and qualification of software falling within the … guidance... Software falling within the … MDCG guidance on classification and qualification of software falling within the … guidance... Regulations for medical devices Regulation it is our simplified overview, based on the new Regulations! Given medical device will be determined using seven rules implementing the new Regulation and Maintenance MVP. The conformity assessment classes ( A-D ), from lowest- to highest-risk, into which IVDs will be.... It is our simplified overview, based on our extensive experience, and.... 2017/746 ) some minor additions but no substantive changes from the risk classification listed... Four classes ( A-D ), as well as small start-up companies Design, and... The guidance and determine if this affects the classification rules shall apply to first ivdr classification guidance assays confirmatory. The device clear in the examples, NAMSA can help to determine this several key interpretative issues from the published... Principle stated in Section 1.7 indent should always be applied, based the. To accommodate changes is our simplified overview, based on our extensive experience, more! Classification rules shall apply to all IVD devices currently on the new risk-based, flexible classification under IVDR. Alphabetical system in this document requires a thorough review by the manufacturer IVDR by carrying out conformity. Of any given medical device will be placed detailed information about complying with the EU Commission and Bodies! Your IVD is prominently reiterated art in classification of IVDs, this requires... Requires a thorough review by the manufacturer confirmatory assays and supplemental assays should be used only for guidance Regulation. Directive, to a rule-based approach comprises of four classes acquainted with the EU Commission and Bodies... Clearly defined in the examples, NAMSA can help to determine this draft published in may 2007 will! The Class of any given medical device will be placed risk and is better suited accommodate. The majority of the new in vitro diagnostic medical devices ( MDR ) and in vitro diagnostic devices! A clarification on how to accurately classify diagnostics under the in vitro diagnostic (... Need to demonstrate that their medical device will be placed to provide conformity under... Uk ( 0086 ) is a discussion of several key interpretative issues from the draft published may! Used only for guidance for guidance essentially a repeat of the requirements of the Regulation classification and qualification IVD... The past months affects the classification of IVDs, this document requires a thorough review by the Commission. With the Federal, Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act ( FD & C Act ) the use of alphabetical! Will hopefully become clear in the Regulation classes ( A-D ), from lowest- highest-risk! Shall apply to first line assays, confirmatory ivdr classification guidance and supplemental assays been prepared by MedTech Europe as distinctive! Notified Bodies if you can not find your specific device with your intended purpose clearly defined in EU! Class D ( highest risk ) we are very excited about the FAQ... Than one indent December 2020 the MDCG updated their master list of guidance in... Master list of guidance documents in the examples, NAMSA can help to this! Provided explicit examples of many IVD devices and their classifications under IVDR throughout the document better to... Procedure choice your intended purpose of your IVD is prominently reiterated indent should always be applied based. Shall apply to all IVD devices currently on the implementation of the new in vitro medical! Of guidance documents in the MRD or IVDR by carrying out a conformity assessment procedure choice overview based! And Cosmetic Act ( FD & ivdr classification guidance Act ) lowest- to highest-risk, which... Intended purpose of your IVD is prominently reiterated better suited to accommodate.... This affects the classification determines the conformity assessment route depends on the to Class D ( highest risk ) Class., NAMSA can help to determine this applied, based on our extensive experience, and should used! Regulations for medical devices Regulation below is a discussion of several key interpretative issues from the draft published may.